Skip to content

Home / Equipment / Ropes

Ropes

Climbing ropes, and what their standards test.

A climbing rope's marking and instructions give a type symbol, an impact force, a fall count and stretch figures. This page explains what each of those numbers comes from in the EN 892 and UIAA 101 tests, how dynamic ropes differ from static and low-stretch ones, and what makers say their figures mean.

Disclosure: this page has affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. How this works.

Get instruction

This page explains what standards bodies, federations and makers publish. It is not a substitute for instruction from a qualified instructor or guide, and it does not replace medical advice.

Four kinds of rope, four standards

RopeStandardsWhat the defining body says it is for
Dynamic ropeEN 892:2012+A3:2023 and UIAA 101 (ninth edition, version 9.1, July 2025)Arresting the free fall of a climber with a limited peak force, as one part of the safety chain (UIAA, 2025)
Low-stretch kernmantel ropeEN 1891:1998 and UIAA 107Type A for general use in rope access, work positioning, rescue and caving; Type B a lower-performance rope needing more care (UIAA table, 2025)
Static ropeUIAA 110 (approved June 2025; no EN equivalent)Ropes of any diameter with very low stretch and set strengths with and without terminations (UIAA, 2025)
Accessory cordEN 564:2023 and UIAA 102Cord of 4 to 8 mm meant to withstand forces but not absorb energy (UIAA table, 2025)

The UIAA Safety Commission's note of 15 October 2025 states that low-elongation ropes to UIAA 102 and static ropes to UIAA 110 are not designed for any dynamic use, do not limit impact forces and need other equipment to absorb energy. Both EN 892 and UIAA 110 require kernmantel construction, a load-bearing core inside a protective sheath.

Single, half and twin dynamic ropes

EN 892 defines three types of dynamic rope, each marked at the rope end with its own symbol: a circled 1 for a single rope, a circled 1/2 for a half rope and two interlinked circles for a twin rope. Edelrid, a maker, summarises the standard's definitions this way: a single rope is tested to arrest a leader fall as one strand, a half rope when used as a pair, and a twin rope when used in parallel as a pair.

A BMC article from 30 March 2001 described single ropes as suited to fairly straight rock pitches, half ropes as the BMC's recommendation then for trad, mountaineering and long routes, and twin ropes as of limited use and largely replaced by light half ropes. That is a 2001 description and may not reflect current practice.

What the EN 892 tests measure

The figures below are the laboratory requirements a new rope sample must meet, as the UIAA tabled them in October 2025. They describe the test, not what a rope will do in use.

Test (EN 892, per UIAA 2025)SingleHalfTwin
Falling mass in the drop test80 kg55 kg, one strand80 kg, two strands
Maximum peak force on the first drop12 kN8 kN12 kN
Minimum number of test drops held5512
Maximum dynamic elongation, first drop40%40%40%
Maximum static elongation, 5 kg to 80 kg10%12%10%
Maximum sheath slippage1% (20 mm on a 2,000 mm sample)1%1%

The UIAA gives the drop test geometry as a 4,800 mm fall on a 2,800 mm sample, which it states as a fall factor of 1.7; Edelrid's summary also gives about 1.7. A Petzl page we could not date, seen only as a search snippet, describes the test as simulating a factor 1.77 fall; we could not open that page, so the 1.77 figure is unconfirmed.

A BMC article of 2001 gave lower static elongation limits, 8% for single and 10% for double ropes. That likely reflects an earlier edition of the standard, but which edition is not confirmed. The amendments to EN 892:2012, A1 (2016), A2 (2021) and A3 (2023), are listed by national standards catalogues; what each changed was not found.

Fall rating and impact force, as makers explain them

Sterling, a rope maker, said in October 2017 that a rope's fall rating is the number of drops it held in certification testing, not the number it can hold in real use, and that a higher number does not make a rope better. Sterling says test drops are repeated every 5 minutes until the rope fails, that test peak forces start around 9 kN and rise above 12 kN on later drops, and claims that real-world falls almost never exceed 5 kN. Those are Sterling's claims.

The BMC's 2001 article explained impact force as the force on the climber when a fall is held, with a lower figure meaning a softer catch and less load on the protection. It said impact force rises as a rope is used and falls accumulate, and warned that makers' drops-to-failure figures vary between test rigs.

Published figures also carry tolerances. Petzl's rope notice (26 March 2024) gives its own as diameter plus or minus 0.2 mm, mass plus or minus 2 g per metre, falls plus or minus 2, static elongation plus or minus 1%, dynamic elongation plus or minus 3% and impact force plus or minus 1 kN, and claims zero sheath slippage for its ropes.

Markings and the information a rope must carry

According to Edelrid's summary of EN 892, the rope must be marked with the maker, year of manufacture, length, diameter, type symbol and the CE mark with the four-digit notified body number. The instructions must give the static and dynamic elongation, impact force, number of falls and sheath slippage, and explain the markings and the rope's lifespan. Beal, for example, says the last two digits of its serial number give the year of manufacture (2014 document).

What UIAA 101 adds

UIAA 101 grants its label only to ropes that meet all of EN 892:2012+A3:2023 plus the UIAA's extra requirements. The UIAA says version 9.1 only updated the EN reference and did not change requirements. Among the additions in the July 2025 text:

  • The rope-end marking may be printed on the rope instead of on the durable end bands EN 892 requires.
  • Where a rope has a middle marker, it must sit within 1% of the published length of the true middle; not every rope has one.
  • The measured length must equal or exceed the published length.
  • The instructions must warn that ropes may shrink in normal use and give minimum and maximum storage temperatures.
  • Instructions may be supplied by QR code or another electronic link marked with an open-booklet icon.
  • An optional test measures the energy a rope absorbs before breaking over a defined steel edge with a 100 kg mass, reported in kJ per metre. Edelrid notes that no pass or fail level is defined for it.

Version 7 (July 2017) dropped the old "multidrop rope" designation, which had covered single or half ropes holding 10 or more test drops.

The UIAA Water Repellent label

A rope certified to UIAA 101 may be labelled "UIAA Water Repellent" only if its average water uptake in the UIAA's laboratory test is under 5.0% of its weight. The test abrades a sample by drawing it through a modified sheath-slippage device, exposes it to running water for 15 minutes and weighs it, on three samples. Since 2019 makers may publish the measured value to the nearest 0.1%. The BMC's 2001 article said dry treatment reduces moisture and dirt uptake and wears off with heavy use.

Static, low-stretch and accessory cord figures

Under EN 1891 and UIAA 107, static elongation between 50 kg and 150 kg is limited to 5%, and minimum strength is 22 kN (Type A) or 18 kN (Type B) without terminations, and 15 kN or 12 kN with terminations (UIAA table, 2025). The table also lists a 5-drop dynamic test with a peak force under 6 kN, though its layout leaves the fall factor pairing unclear.

The UIAA says it created UIAA 110 because ropes thinner than 8.5 mm were being sold for crevasse rescue, rappelling and hauling while certified only as accessory cord, which has no requirement for strength with terminations or for holding a fall. UIAA 110 sets no diameter limits, caps static elongation at 2.5% between 50 kg and 150 kg, and requires at least 8 kN with figure-of-8 terminations and 12 kN without. Accessory cord minimum strengths under UIAA 102 and EN 564:2023 run from 3.2 kN at 4 mm to 12.8 kN at 8 mm.

Lifespan

Rope makers give different maximum ages, each for its own ropes: Sterling caps storage plus use at 10 years (2019), Edelrid gives 12 years unused (2013), and Beal allows up to 15 years including 5 years of storage (2014). All three say a rope can need retiring far sooner, even after one event. These are makers' statements, not universal rules; the maker's instructions and a competent person decide. The gear lifespan and gear care pages set out each statement in full.

Keep reading

Disclosure The Gear Sports Climbing is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Our recommendations are independent.